OpportunityMarket home
Banking & Payment Apps opportunities·tracked since 27 Aug 2026·evidence from 03 Jul 2019·scored 32m ago

Challenges with Money Transfer Application

Users find the BIDV Smart OTP application overly complicated and frustrating, leading to difficulties in performing basic transactions like transferring money. Many users express dissatisfaction with frequent errors and a lack of clear guidance, resulting in a negative experience that may drive them to consider switching to other banks.

144 people in 144 posts across 1 source · demand low, pain low, competition low

Pain pointStableEvidence: medium
Index score
30.8
ahead of 26% of the rest of this market
0.0%score / 7d0.0%signals / 7d
Demand
0.0low
Momentum
42.8moderate
Pain
0.0low
Competition
26.3low
lower is better
Monetization
11.6low
Market size
23.7low
Evidence
53.9moderate

The pain

shares of 144 quoted posts

What goes wrong, and for whom

Who
144 people using BIDV Smart OTP
What goes wrong
  • Wastes time17% of posts
  • Doesn't work15% of posts
How bad
85% of posts are complaints
Since
03 Jul 2019 → 17 Jan 2026

Is this a startup idea?

Not directly. These are complaints about a product or service people already use — the fix belongs first to that provider.

Complaints are about
BIDV Smart OTP
Looking for something else
10% want an alternative · 5% ask the provider for a feature
What the numbers say
Almost nobody is looking for a different product — people want this provider to fix it, not a new option.
Build a prototype from thisA landing page written from these 40 complaints by 144 people.50 credits · sign in →
1

The pain — what people say

Their asks, who is writing, and the posts themselves

What people were doing

Every post behind this page, by what its author was doing — and when each one was written

144posts
  • Complaint12285%
  • Looking for an alternative1510%
  • Request75%
19 Feb 2019144 posts17 Jan 2026

Sources

144 signals · 1 sources

App Store144
Only public content is collected, author names are stored as one-way hashes, and every excerpt links back to its original post.

Evidence

Raw public posts behind this opportunity — click through to the original

  • App StoreApp Store VN/Ngân hàng·05 Jul 2019·Complaintsource ↗

    BIDV Smart OTP — Lỗi tùm lum — SmartBanking thường xuyên lỗi “Error backend”. Lần đầu vào bắt đổi mật khẩu, đổi xong không đăng nhập được. Dùng chức năng quên mật khẩu, đã nhập đúng thông tin để lấy lại mật khẩu thì nhận thông báo thông tin không đúng. SmartOTP thì hay bảo trì không cho vào lấy OTP để giao dịch. Khi…

    Asking howFrustratedDoesn't work
  • App StoreApp Store VN/Ngân hàng·31 Oct 2019·Complaintsource ↗

    …hì tin nhắn cũng không nhắn về. Không có mã OTP không giao dịch được. Chán, quá thất vọng!!!!

    Strong complaintDoesn't work
  • App StoreApp Store VN/Ngân hàng·12 Feb 2022·Complaintsource ↗

    BIDV Smart OTP — APP TỆ NHẤT THẾ GIỚI Lỗi liên tục, mỗi lần thực hiện chuyển tiền online bằng app BIDV vừa mất thời gian vừa tụt luôn mood để làm việc…! Tưởng là chuyện nhỏ nhưng không hề nhỏ! Với cái app cùi bắp như vậy làm mất uy tín của doanh nghiệp, của khách hàng…! Chỉ muốn bỏ luôn cái tài khoản của ngân hàng…

    Doesn't workWastes time
  • App StoreApp Store VN/Ngân hàng·01 Sept 2019·Complaintsource ↗

    BIDV Smart OTP — Phần mềm vô dụng — Chán k tả dc luôn. Bidv smartbanking h ko hiện mã giao dịch cũng chả lấy dc luôn mã otp. Từ lúc thêm cái app này gây bao phiền phức cho người dùng. Muốn chuyển tiền mà mất thời gian. Viết ra cái app mà ko test xem nó có hữu dụng cho người dùng ko.

    Strong complaintWastes time
  • App StoreApp Store VN/Ngân hàng·03 Jul 2019·Complaintsource ↗

    …. tôi xài đen trắng mã otp về đ** sợ bị hakc. càng hiện đại càng ngu. Đm đăng ký otp mãi đ** hiểu đăng ký như nào. thằng nào tạo ra cái này như cha chúng mày có thời gian ngồi nghiên cứu rồi bật laptop ra đăng ký vậy. Ngu cũng ở một mức độ vừa phải thôi. Làm gì cũng cho người ta dễ dàng đăng ký! Quá tệ!

    Asking howStrong complaint
25 more evidence rowsSign in — it's free

Problem clusters

Distinct problems aggregated into this opportunity

K có hướng dẫn cụ thể, mỗi lần thoát đăng nhập là phải ra phong giao dịch, khó hiểu cái ứ…
47 mentions · 47 people
BIDV Smart OTP — Phần mềm quá tệ.
40 mentions · 40 people
Ứng dụng gì cứ lỗi lỗi hoài méo thể đăng nhập được.
33 mentions · 33 people
Ứng dụng quá phiền phức cho người sử dụng
24 mentions · 24 people
2

Market and score

Products already there, how the score moved, and what it is made of

Opportunity history

Every score change is stored as a snapshot — click a sub-score to overlay it

Why did it move?

Score 30.0 → 30.8 · 02 Sept 2026, 08:00 → 09:15 UTC

Score attributionSign in — it's free
How the score was measured
36 measured values behind the seven sub-scores · each shows the value, then the points it earned out of 100
Show ↓
Market size
Distinct people affected144 66
Distinct communities0 0
Distinct sources0 0
Adjacent categories0 0
Regions / languages0 0
Competition
Existing products5 50
New entrants (90d)0 0
Funded players0 0
Momentum
Period-over-period growth0 40
Latest period growth0 43
Sustained trend0 43
Acceleration0 50
Monetization
Stated willingness to pay0 0
Existing paid products5 50
Pricing complaints0 0
Business context0 0
Pain
Complaint intensity0 0
Negative sentiment0 0
Complaint frequency0 0
Willingness to switch0 0
Urgency0 0
Willingness to pay0 0
Repeat complaints0 0
Evidence
Evidence volume144 61
Source diversity1 35
Source credibility72 72
Extraction confidence29.9 30
Duplicate rate0 100
Freshness249.3 0
Cluster cohesion90 90
Demand
Mention volume0 0
Explicit requests0 0
Distinct people0 0
Questions asked0 0
Alternative searches0 0
Feature requests0 0

Questions about this idea

Is Challenges with Money Transfer Application a startup idea?
Not directly. These are complaints about a product or service people already use, and the fix belongs first to that provider. The page shows what is frustrating users and how badly — not an open market to start a company in.
How many people have this problem?
144 different people described it independently, in 144 mentions, the earliest from 03 Jul 2019 and the most recent from 17 Jan 2026. The quotes, with dates and links to the originals, are in the Evidence section.
Is this problem getting worse?
Current status: stable — mentioned at a steady rate. Momentum is 43/100, measured as how often it is mentioned recently compared with before.

Adjacent opportunities

Nearest neighbours by embedding similarity

Discussion

Written by readers. Not part of the evidence above and not counted in any score.

Sign in to join the discussion.

No comments yet

If you have run into this problem, what did you try?