OpportunityMarket home
Banking & Payment Apps opportunities·tracked since 24 Sept 2026·evidence from 12 Aug 2026·scored 54m ago

BIDV SmartBanking: Poor Service Quality at BIDV SmartBanking

BIDV SmartBanking faces significant issues with poor service quality and customer support, leading to dissatisfaction among users. The platform is criticized for its unreliable functionality, difficult interface, and inadequate product offerings.

9 different people have complained about this since 12 Aug 2026, most recently on 14 Sept 2026.

  • user·20db· App Store· 04 Aug 2026original ↗
    “BIDV SmartBanking — Chất lượng phục vụ khách hàng quá tệ.”
  • user·6b76· App Store· 09 Jul 2026original ↗
    “Lúc nào cũng thấy cập nhật, máy hết cả dung lượng cứ cập nhật mãi, hậu chăm sóc khách hàng kém.”
  • user·b369· App Store· 12 Aug 2026original ↗
    “BIDV SmartBanking — Đánh giá chất lượng dịch vụ.”
See every post behind this page ↓Hit this yourself? Say what you use instead →

9 people in 9 posts across 1 source · demand low, pain low, competition low

Pain pointDeclining💤 QuietEvidence: low
Index score
31.4
ahead of 37% of the rest of this market
0.0%score / 7d0.0%signals / 7d
Posts per week, last 16 weeks · 1 in the past 4
Demand
0.0low
Momentum
29.2low
Pain
9.9low
Competition
26.3low
lower is better
Monetization
17.6low
Market size
27.8low
Evidence
47.9moderate

The pain

shares of 9 quoted posts

What goes wrong, and for whom

Who
9 people using BIDV SmartBanking
What goes wrong
Not classified into a failure type — read the posts below.
How bad
67% of posts are complaints · pain score low (10/100)
Since
12 Aug 2026 → 14 Sept 2026

Is this a startup idea?

Not directly. These are complaints about a product or service people already use — the fix belongs first to that provider.

Complaints are about
BIDV SmartBanking
Looking for something else
0% want an alternative · 22% ask the provider for a feature
What the numbers say
Almost nobody is looking for a different product — people want this provider to fix it, not a new option.
Build a prototype from thisA landing page written from these 9 complaints by 9 people.50 credits · sign in →
1

The pain — what people say

Their asks, who is writing, and the posts themselves

What people were doing

Every post behind this page, by what its author was doing — and when each one was written

9posts
  • Complaint667%
  • Request222%
  • About price111%
08 Jul 20269 posts14 Sept 2026

Sources

9 signals · 1 sources

App Store9
Only public content is collected, author names are stored as one-way hashes, and every excerpt links back to its original post.

Evidence

Raw public posts behind this opportunity — click through to the original

  • user·20dbApp StoreApp Store VN/Ngân hàng·04 Aug 2026·Complaintsource ↗

    BIDV SmartBanking — Chất lượng phục vụ khách hàng quá tệ Dịch vụ khách hàng của BIDV quá tệ. Nhân viên xử lý chậm, thiếu nhiệt tình và không giải quyết vấn đề một cách hiệu quả. Trải nghiệm này khiến tôi rất thất vọng và mất niềm tin vào chất lượng dịch vụ. Hy vọng BIDV nghiêm túc xem xét, chấn chỉnh và cải thiện cách…

    Strong complaint
  • user·777aApp StoreApp Store VN/Ngân hàng·25d ago·Requestsource ↗

    …n lí tài khoản???? Giao diện thì loè loẹt, lãi không kì hạn thì thấp. Ko có 1 cái sản phẩm nào nên hồn

  • user·6b76App StoreApp Store VN/Ngân hàng·09 Jul 2026·Requestsource ↗

    …chung mình không dùng ngân hàng này lâu r, không hài lòng về dịch vụ. Lúc nào cũng thấy cập nhật, máy hết cả dung lượng cứ cập nhật mãi, hậu chăm sóc khách hàng kém. Trừ phí dịch vụ mỗi tháng không hài lòng, mặc dù không dùng. Mình dùng là vì cơ quan mình bắt sử dụng để nhận lương chứ mà nhiều khi muốn rút hết cũng…

  • user·b369App StoreApp Store VN/Ngân hàng·12 Aug 2026·About pricesource ↗

    BIDV SmartBanking — Đánh giá chất lượng dịch vụ Quá kém, hỗ trợ check thông tin không chính xác.

  • user·31e9App StoreApp Store VN/Ngân hàng·10 Jul 2026·Complaintsource ↗

    BIDV SmartBanking — Quá kém Ngân hàng rẻ rách , giao diện áp khó dùng Sao kê ol còn trừ tiền Quá tệ

    Strong complaint
4 more evidence rowsSign in — it's free
2

Market and score

Products already there, how the score moved, and what it is made of

Opportunity history

Every score change is stored as a snapshot — click a sub-score to overlay it

Why did it move?

Score unchanged at 31.4 · 08 Oct 2026, 17:00 → 18:15 UTC

Score attributionSign in — it's free
How the score was measured
37 measured values behind the seven sub-scores · each shows the value, then the points it earned out of 100
Show ↓
Market size
Distinct people affected9 → 31
Distinct communities1 → 17
Distinct sources1 → 35
Adjacent categories1 → 32
Regions / languages1 → 28
Monetization
Stated willingness to pay15 → 15
Existing paid products5 → 50
Pricing complaints0 → 0
Business context0 → 0
Momentum
Period-over-period growth-75 → 5
Latest period growth0 → 43
Sustained trend-5.1 → 34
Acceleration2 → 53
Competition
Existing products5 → 50
New entrants (90d)0 → 0
Funded players0 → 0
Pain
Complaint intensity30 → 30
Complaint frequency0 → 0
Negative sentiment50 → 0
Willingness to switch0 → 0
Willingness to pay15 → 15
Urgency0 → 0
Repeat complaints0 → 0
Evidence
Evidence volume9 → 28
Source diversity1 → 35
Extraction confidence29.1 → 29
Source credibility72 → 72
Duplicate rate0 → 100
Freshness24.6 → 31
Cluster cohesion94.1 → 94
Demand
Mention volume1 → 9
Explicit requests1 → 13
Distinct people1 → 10
Questions asked0 → 0
Alternative searches0 → 0
Feature requests1 → 12
Discussion growth-50 → 5

Questions about this idea

Is Poor Service Quality at BIDV SmartBanking a startup idea?
Not directly. These are complaints about a product or service people already use, and the fix belongs first to that provider. The page shows what is frustrating users and how badly — not an open market to start a company in.
How many people have this problem?
9 different people described it independently, in 9 mentions, the earliest from 12 Aug 2026 and the most recent from 14 Sept 2026. The quotes, with dates and links to the originals, are in the Evidence section.
Is this problem getting worse?
Current status: declining — mentioned less often than before. Momentum is 29/100, measured as how often it is mentioned recently compared with before.

Adjacent opportunities

Nearest neighbours by embedding similarity

Have you run into this?

Written by readers, except comments marked Team, which are ours. Not part of the evidence above and not counted in any score.

No replies yet — be the first

Create a free account to answer — it takes a few seconds and brings you back here. Already have one? Sign in

No comments yet

If you have run into this problem, what did you try?