Need for Better Channel Organization in Discord
Users are frustrated with the inability to manually organize channels in Discord. They seek a platform that allows for better channel organization within servers.
6 different people have asked for or struggled with this since 10 Feb 2026, most recently on 19 Feb 2026.
No new posts for 262 days. This may have been fixed, or people stopped writing about it — the evidence below is from before 19 Feb 2026.
- “Signal or Telegram — Great for secure, encrypted messaging (Signal especially), but voice/video is more basic and lacks full server/channel structures.”
- “(please let me manually organize the channels in a guild matrix!).”
- “Change my mind: There is no good alternative to Discord (yet?).”
6 people in 6 posts across 2 sources · 0 in the last 30 days, 0 in the 30 before
The pain
What goes wrong, and for whom
- Who
- 6 different people
- Since
- 10 Feb 2026 → 19 Feb 2026
The opportunity
from the same postsWhether this pain leaves room for a product
- Demand
- 6 people raised it · 0 in the last 30 days, 0 in the 30 before
- Looking for something else
- 33% want an alternative · 17% ask for a feature · 17% mention price
- What the numbers say
- 33% of posts are people looking for an alternative — the clearest sign there is room for a new product. Not shown by this data: whether they would pay.
The pain — what people say
Their asks, who is writing, and the posts themselves
What people were doing
Every post behind this page, by what its author was doing — and when each one was written
- Complaint233%
- Looking for an alternative233%
- Request117%
- About price117%
Sources
6 signals · 2 sources
Evidence
Raw public posts behind this opportunity — click through to the original. 1 post was held back as off-topic; all 6 still count toward the score.
…ng, and structured channels. Less ideal for casual gaming hangouts. Signal or Telegram — Great for secure, encrypted messaging (Signal especially), but voice/video is more basic and lacks full server/channel structures. Zulip — Threaded conversations (unique UI), good for organized discussions, open-source, and…
Wants a free optionMissing feature…ng from discord. Guilds are not the most featureful or intuitive. (please let me manually organize the channels in a guild matrix!). It seems like mod tools are not the best from what I'm reading. Root (Closed Source) (all platforms) Pros Voice, video, and screen share support Easy to make and customize guilds (some…
Wants a free optionManual workChange my mind: There is no good alternative to Discord (yet?) There is no alternative which offers: (group) voice chat, (group) text chat, live screen sharing, permission system easy selfhosting with docker open source respects privacy (looking at you matrix) decentralized at best costs nothing Checked: XMPP based…
Wants an alternative…lack alternative for people wanting to host a server for a community. It's not a platform, you need to register and login to each server manually. I haven't used Zulip but AFAIK it's like Rocket Chat. Ditto on Mattermost. Discourse is a forum. Stoat is basically the only thing here that actually competes on Discord…
Manual workStoat: A Good Alternative to Discord? — I've been looking for alternatives to discord recently, but its been kinda hard. Most of them are either too corporate, unsafe(looking at you Matrix) or just outright bad But then I found Stoat, and it seems almost like a 1:1 to discord, with a few differences: 1)…
Wants an alternative
The opportunity — market and score
Products already there, how the score moved, and what it is made of
Opportunity history
Every score change is stored as a snapshot — click a sub-score to overlay it
Why did it move?
Score 27.2 → 27.1 · 28 Oct 2026, 00:00 → 01:15 UTC
How the score was measured38 measured values behind the seven sub-scores · each shows the value, then the points it earned out of 100Show ↓Hide ↑
Questions about this idea
- Is Need for Better Channel Organization in Discord a good startup idea?
- It has an Opportunity Score of 27.1, from 6 mentions by 6 different people across 2 sources. Demand is low (0/100), pain low (0/100) and competition low (31/100). This measures what people said, not what they paid for — test willingness to pay before building.
- How many people have this problem?
- 6 different people described it independently, in 6 mentions, the earliest from 10 Feb 2026 and the most recent from 19 Feb 2026. The quotes, with dates and links to the originals, are in the Evidence section.
- How crowded is this market?
- Measured competition is low (31/100). Low competition can be a real gap or simply thin data — look for competitors yourself before concluding either.
- Is demand for this growing?
- Status: quiet — no new posts in the last 60 days. 0 people raised it in the last 30 days and 0 in the 30 days before; the status compares its share of everything collected from the same source, so collecting more or less cannot create a trend.
Adjacent opportunities
Nearest neighbours by embedding similarity
Would you use this? Have you tried building it?
Written by readers, except comments marked Team, which are ours. Not part of the evidence above and not counted in any score.
Create a free account to answer — it takes a few seconds and brings you back here. Already have one? Sign in
No comments yet
If you have run into this problem, what did you try?