Compact Alternative to Pie/Donut Charts
There is a need for a simpler and more compact alternative to traditional pie and donut charts for displaying percentages and proportions. This suggests a challenge in effectively visualizing data in a way that is both clear and efficient.
5 different people have asked for or struggled with this since 31 Aug 2026, most recently on 25 Oct 2026. 3 of them in the last 30 days.
- “You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting .”
- “use(browser()) inside a boundary marks a subtree as browser-only without reporting a recoverable error ( @gnoff : #37143 , #37241 ) Added an onBrowserBailout option to the react-dom/server APIs to observe when a…”
- “Fixes missing styles, links, and scripts from content collection entries rendered inside server islands - #17861 Thanks @ethanstoner!”
5 people in 23 posts across 1 source · 3 in the last 30 days, 3 in the 30 before
The pain
What goes wrong, and for whom
- Who
- 5 people, in Product Analytics
- Since
- 31 Aug 2026 → 25 Oct 2026
The opportunity
from the same postsWhether this pain leaves room for a product
- Demand
- 5 people raised it · 3 in the last 30 days, 3 in the 30 before
- Looking for something else
- 17% want an alternative · 13% ask for a feature · 4% mention price
- What the numbers say
- 17% of posts are people looking for an alternative — the clearest sign there is room for a new product. Not shown by this data: whether they would pay.
The pain — what people say
Their asks, who is writing, and the posts themselves
People are asking for
In their own words — asks pulled from the evidence, most-repeated first
“Simpler and more compact alternative to pie/donut charts for displaying percentages and proportions.”
What people were doing
Every post behind this page, by what its author was doing — and when each one was written
- Complaint1565%
- Looking for an alternative417%
- Request313%
- About price14%
Sources
23 signals · 1 sources
Evidence
Raw public posts behind this opportunity — click through to the original
chore(deps): bump the npm-minor-and-patch group across 1 directory with 8 updates — Bumps the npm-minor-and-patch group with 8 updates in the / directory: | Package | From | To | | --- | --- | --- | | p-limit | `7.3.1` | `7.3.2` | |…
Manual workchore(deps): bump the npm-minor-and-patch group across 1 directory with 15 updates — [//]: # (dependabot-start) ⚠️ Dependabot is rebasing this PR ⚠️ Rebasing might not happen immediately, so don't worry if this takes some time. Note: if you make any changes to this PR yourself, they will take precedence over…
Missing featurechore(deps-dev): bump the npm-dev-minor-patch group with 6 updates — Bumps the npm-dev-minor-patch group with 6 updates: | Package | From | To | | --- | --- | --- | | @biomejs/biome | `2.5.12` | `2.5.13` | |…
Manual workchore(deps): update dependencies — > ℹ️ Note > This PR body was truncated due to platform limits. This PR was generated using ocavue/config-renovate with ❤️ This PR contains the following updates: | Package | Change |…
Strong complaintMissing featureUsing a workaroundUpdate all non-major dependencies — > ℹ️ Note > This PR body was truncated due to platform limits. This PR contains the following updates: | Package | Change | Age | Confidence | |---|---|---|---| |…
Wants a free optionMissing featureManual work
The opportunity — market and score
Products already there, how the score moved, and what it is made of
Opportunity history
Every score change is stored as a snapshot — click a sub-score to overlay it
Why did it move?
Score unchanged at 48.9 · 25 Oct 2026, 17:00 → 18:15 UTC
How the score was measured40 measured values behind the seven sub-scores · each shows the value, then the points it earned out of 100Show ↓Hide ↑
Questions about this idea
- Is Compact Alternative to Pie/Donut Charts a good startup idea?
- It has an Opportunity Score of 48.9, from 23 mentions by 5 different people across 1 sources. Demand is low (38/100), pain moderate (53/100) and competition moderate (53/100). This measures what people said, not what they paid for — test willingness to pay before building.
- How many people have this problem?
- 5 different people described it independently, in 23 mentions, the earliest from 31 Aug 2026 and the most recent from 25 Oct 2026. The quotes, with dates and links to the originals, are in the Evidence section.
- How crowded is this market?
- Measured competition is moderate (53/100). Low competition can be a real gap or simply thin data — look for competitors yourself before concluding either.
- Is demand for this growing?
- Status: steady — no change the counts can show. 3 people raised it in the last 30 days and 3 in the 30 days before; the status compares its share of everything collected from the same source, so collecting more or less cannot create a trend.
Adjacent opportunities
Nearest neighbours by embedding similarity
Would you use this? Have you tried building it?
Written by readers, except comments marked Team, which are ours. Not part of the evidence above and not counted in any score.
Create a free account to answer — it takes a few seconds and brings you back here. Already have one? Sign in
No comments yet
If you have run into this problem, what did you try?